Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z370 HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 HD3
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 HD3  (all builds)
Memory40 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 11:40
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 85.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 249
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 827
78% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,071
66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 113
Parallax 119
100% 119 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 118
Splatting 100
104% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 66 56 48 50 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 448
Mixed 360
SusWrite 85.1
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 52.1
178% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 223
204% 313 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 118%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
273GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 393 401 409 408 384 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 376
Mixed 396
SusWrite 397
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 51.2
177% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 304
244% 342 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 114%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST8000AS0003-2HH188 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 105 103 103 103 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 91
Write 91.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 102
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
167% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$50
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 121 118 121 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 164
Write 168
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 118
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK32GX4M2A2400C14 029E CMK32GX4M2A2400C14 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.2% Very good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 HD3 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback