Today's hottest deals

Intel H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel H55  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 14:54
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 98.3
50% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 139
17% 131 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 86CB) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 4.66
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 5.74
4% 5.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD320 128GB-$92
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 82 86 83 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 119
Write 117
Mixed 122
SusWrite 84.4
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 9.9
44% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 67.8
61% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST2000NM0011 2TB-$61
1.5TB free
Firmware: PT05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 145 148 148 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 128
Write 125
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 145
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
193% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.3% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 10.4
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55 Builds (Compare 2,148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback