Today's hottest deals

Asrock H77M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H77M  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130809
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 12:22
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$93
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 203
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 375
51% 378 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17% Very poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 53.5
8% 30.3 fps
MRender 50.3
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 36
34% 42.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 17%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$49
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP76
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 86 137 152 154 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 113
Write 13.7
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 132
51% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 112%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 198 199 199 199 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 189
Write 165
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 198
214% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77M Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $568
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback