Today's hottest deals

Acer V3-771

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer V3-771  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HC
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit farver,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130306
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '17 at 17:14
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 169
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 376
41% 322 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0686) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 6.23
Parallax 2.75
3% 4.34 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.65
4% 5.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 511
Write 415
Mixed 421
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 22.2
122% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 17.7
35% 67 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
15GB free
Firmware: GH2ZB550 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 94.6
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.18
71% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.7% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical V3-771 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer V3-771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback