Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '17 at 05:24
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 96
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 356
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.7.3
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.6% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 87.6
49% 71.1 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 55
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 414
Mixed 421
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 43
137% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 91.8
99% 168 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
677GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 142
Write 120
Mixed 123
97% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.45
125% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 76%
Maxtor 6H500F0 500GB
442GB free
Firmware: HA431DD0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 64
Mixed 67.6
50% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.56
4K Mixed 0.42
137% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 37%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
265GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 113
Write 97.6
Mixed 95.8
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.45
130% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-198.A00LF 9905403-198.A00LF 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback