PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO (all builds) |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161216 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Feb 13 '17 at 17:08 |
Run Duration | 225 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7600K-$135
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
|
95.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2020 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.2
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
84.2%
Excellent
|
||||
42.9%
Average
|
||||
49.2%
Average
|
||||
Seagate Expansion 320GB
298GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
8.74%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905678-026.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
41.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $85Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 4,786x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $93Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 882x |
Core i7-7700KIntel $148Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 631x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 1,033x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 931x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 494x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $647 |