Today's hottest deals

AZW Gemini X55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAZW Gemini X55  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 18 '20 at 10:25
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 43
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 114
40% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 180
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.07
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 2.91
2% 2.94 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 3.77
Splatting 6.83
4% 5.01 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256G 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 93 16 83 22 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 404
Write 316
Mixed 10
SusWrite 102
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.4
18% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 142%
WD Blue 500GB-$94
319GB free
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 313 306 303 306 303 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 367
Write 338
Mixed 216
SusWrite 306
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 35.7
111% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 216
193% 293 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
25.5% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gemini X55 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AZW Gemini X55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback