Today's hottest deals

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory88 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '17 at 21:25
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 92.3
43% 70 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 630
47% 424 Pts
64-Core 1616
100% 1616 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Elitegroup(1019 2028) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 38
Parallax 28.2
20% 30.4 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 26.2
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 496
Write 397
Mixed 243
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 19.6
85% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 63
69% 118 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 134%
WL1000GSA6454G 1TB
914GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 151
Write 145
Mixed 111
101% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.29
112% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 85%
StoreJet Transcend 750GB
336GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 24.7
Mixed 6.7
24% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.19
19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 H... 96GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 29.8
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.7
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback