Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T935

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK T935  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB288
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '20 at 12:49
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 134
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 204
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 1898) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5
Parallax 6.5
4% 5.6 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 7.65
5% 5.86 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$239
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 232 235 226 235 232 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 350
Write 101
Mixed 136
SusWrite 232
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 17.2
88% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 52.3
81% 160 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 85%
USB Disk 2.0 64GB
57GB free, PID 0125
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 1.8 3.6 4.6 1.7 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Read 10.8
Write 1.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 3.2
6% 5.48 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK T935 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T935

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback