PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus H61M-PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20141125 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | May 15 '20 at 12:32 |
Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
Run User | IRL-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
80.2%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS722525VLSA80 250GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V36OA6MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 35 32 35 42 39 MB/s
|
22.6%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
146GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 75 76 75 MB/s
|
41.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
64.9%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-3220Intel $92Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 30x |
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 30x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 30x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 29x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 22x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $92 |