PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180314 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 12 '20 at 12:43 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
|
65.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 288 291 294 276 282 MB/s
|
90.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Kingston SVP100S296G 96GB
35GB free
Firmware: CJR10202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 200 197 202 204 204 MB/s
|
69%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 194 198 198 198 197 MB/s
|
111%
Outstanding
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
49GB free, PID a009
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 59 59 59 MB/s
|
25.7%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team Team--Elite-1333 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 175x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 67x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 23x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 26x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 25x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $531 |