Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8394
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 21:44
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 98
2-Core 174
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 456
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
HP(103C 8394) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 48.6
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 74.4
40% 62.5 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 54.7
46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 42%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 931 724 666 804 827 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,782
Write 1,154
Mixed 969
SusWrite 811
262% 1179 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 35.2
102% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 670
DQ Mixed 820
606% 802 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 188%
Great: 346%
Sandisk S3 512G 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 319 369 361 412 433 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 320
Write 306
Mixed 250
SusWrite 368
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 18.3
59% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 259
216% 314 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8ME-8 Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 12GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.3% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 1,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback