Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory5.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 10:58
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$60
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 140
60% 99 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 242
30% 232 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 19.9
16% 18.8 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 66 74 81 126 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.7% Below average
Read 219
Write 196
Mixed 188
SusWrite 88.8
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 16.5
58% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 166
125% 168 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 95%
Patriot Inferno 120GB
50GB free
Firmware: 320A13F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 82 88 78 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.1% Below average
Read 158
Write 114
Mixed 124
SusWrite 83
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 13
54% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 116
89% 120 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback