Today's hottest deals

HP 23-g010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 23-g010  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B08
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140317
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMay 04 '20 at 02:59
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3800 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
25.6% Poor
Memory 40.7
1-Core 19.2
2-Core 38.2
22% 32.7 Pts
4-Core 63.1
8-Core 62.4
8% 62.8 Pts
64-Core 57.2
4% 57.2 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8280
HP(103C 2B08) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 1.94
1% 1.95 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.61
2% 1.92 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 51 42 56 45 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 92.3
Write 17.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 48.3
34% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.43 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 4
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-g010 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 23-g010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $233Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback