Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote TM86

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote TM86  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TM86
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100205
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 23:03
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 330
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 85.1
38% 62.4 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 126
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M
Acer(1025 036D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.44% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.59
1% 1.44 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 2.22
2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.44%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$39
477GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 56 40 57 52 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 54
Write 53.2
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 45.9
34% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 62%
Seagate M3 2TB
177GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 31
Write 25
Mixed 24
SusWrite 17.5
18% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 67%
WD My Book 1230 2TB
907GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 20
Mixed 21
SusWrite 15
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5428-047.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TM86 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TM86

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback