Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4158BP9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 4158BP9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 20:52
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550
1366-pin LGA, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 153
58% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 479
48% 388 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 6900) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 67.9
59% 69.7 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 68.8
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6S 128GB-$106
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 185 84 47 58 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46% Average
Read 222
Write 198
Mixed 138
SusWrite 100
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 25
79% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 93.2
82% 124 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 46%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB
33GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 77 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 85
Write 80.7
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 78.1
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
55GB free
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 83.5
Write 84.5
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 64.7
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B1K70DH0-CK0 8x8GB
8 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.8% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback