Today's hottest deals

HP ElitePad 900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ElitePad 900  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18DC
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150529
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '17 at 20:24
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z2760
U2H1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Memory 37
1-Core 7.9
2-Core 14.4
16% 19.8 Pts
4-Core 25.3
8-Core 24.2
3% 24.8 Pts
64-Core 25.2
2% 25.2 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 20%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator
HP(103C 18DC)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.14.3.1176
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.41
1% 0.63 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GA 31GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.8
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung JM800QSU-2G 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
10% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10%
Great: 10%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback