Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2P  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 13:17
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G540-$70
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G540 @ 2.50GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 41.9
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 133
42% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 129
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 774MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4101
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.88
1% 1.05 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 77.3
Write 80.6
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 35.5
48% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
94% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-002.A01LF 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S2P Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback