Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 14  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198F
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 05:25
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 52.5
43% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 203
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 198F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.11.5
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 4.62
1% 3.1 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 2
Splatting 5.83
4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$109
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R091
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 304 309 352 342 343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 156
Write 293
Mixed 127
SusWrite 296
50% 218 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 6.5
29% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 131
153% 262 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 126%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 29 26 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 46.7
Write 104
Mixed 49
SusWrite 28
81% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB
872GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 126 134 131 137 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 99
Write 61.6
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 122
98% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 14.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 14 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback