| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
| System | Dell Precision M6400 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 076V94 |
| Memory | 12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130605 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 02 '17 at 12:10 |
| Run Duration | 100 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 60% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38.8%
Below average
|
37% 52.2 Pts
|
8% 59.1 Pts
|
4% 72.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M
Dell(1028 019C) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.8992
|
6.48%
Terrible
|
7% 6.63 fps
|
5% 6.09 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD1600BJKT-75F4T0 160GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
35.8%
Below average
|
46% 61.2 MB/s
|
47% 0.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.4%
Very poor
|
16% 5.57 GB/s
|
12% 4.3 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision M6400 Builds (Compare 61 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Precision M6400
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Extreme Q9300Intel $219Bench 46%, 660 samples | 14x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Duo T9550Intel $199Bench 39%, 1,427 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro FX 2700MNvidiaBench 3%, 788 samples | 30x |
| Quadro FX 3700MNvidiaBench 6%, 383 samples | 20x |
| FirePro M7740ATIBench 7%, 225 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $278 |