Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire F5-573G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire F5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Captain_SK
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170526
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 07:08
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 142
54% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 200
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 108F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5038
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 7.03
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 5.53
6% 7.57 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 13.7
7% 7.95 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
549GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 42 27 13 17 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 73.2
Write 95.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 31.3
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.3% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 2.1
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire F5-573G Builds (Compare 1,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback