Today's hottest deals

Gateway ID58 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGateway ID58 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway SJM50MV
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091224
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 22:19
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6500
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 29
2-Core 56.5
35% 50.4 Pts
4-Core 58.8
8-Core 54.2
8% 56.5 Pts
64-Core 54.5
3% 54.5 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G45/G43 Express Chipset
Acer(1025 020A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.51 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 0.7
0% 0.56 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB4OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 24 11 15 58 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 77.3
Write 74.4
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 35.8
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 45%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 19
Write 7.8
Mixed 13.6
SusWrite 25.6
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback