Today's hottest deals

Samsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP355V4C-S01RU
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120607
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 21 '20 at 08:24
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 70
39% 58.3 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 106
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Sanyo(144D C0DD) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 6.92
Parallax 4.03
0% 3.67 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 7.7
5% 5.42 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 52 53 55 49 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 11.5
Write 55.7
Mixed 18
SusWrite 54.4
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 M471B5773EB0-CK0 6GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.4% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.6
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback