Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E780  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB211
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101026
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 20 '20 at 17:30
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 450
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 65
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 111
49% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 130
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Fujitsu(10CF 1583) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.92
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 5.19
Parallax 1.28
3% 3.25 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 3.78
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 240GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 37 36 28 33 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.9% Below average
Read 194
Write 135
Mixed 146
SusWrite 33.4
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 19.5
48% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 86.4
DQ Mixed 105
88% 130 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 94%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 23 23 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 18.3
Write 19.5
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 23
28% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.1
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.4
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 0.2
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E780 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback