Today's hottest deals

MSI A78M-E35 V2 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A78M-E35 V2 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150213
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 20 '20 at 11:01
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 103
50% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 200
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7721) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 9
4% 6.49 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 7.07
Splatting 5.22
4% 5.22 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC256GM1SE16B-T 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 266 271 275 277 276 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 450
Write 276
Mixed 269
SusWrite 266
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 34.2
113% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 163
138% 202 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$42
263GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 80 85 78 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 81.5
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 82.4
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.2% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78M-E35 V2 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A78M-E35 V2 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback