Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '20 at 02:18
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 297
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,108
101% 847 Pts
64-Core 2,078
129% 2,078 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
MSI(1462 373E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 148
Parallax 147
127% 151 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 131
Splatting 106
111% 141 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
684GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1464 1470 1450 1522 1525 1517 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 1,500
Write 1,497
Mixed 1071
SusWrite 1,491
313% 1,390 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 82.3
290% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 962
DQ Mixed 270
358% 637 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 277%
Great: 295%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
544GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 90 95 96 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 62.5
Write 63.5
Mixed 77
SusWrite 95.1
56% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
220% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 92%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
56GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 1.3 14 11 11 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.7
Write 25.5
SusWrite 10.1
25% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.2
61% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
WDC WD60 EZRX-00MVLB1 6TB
217GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.8 0.2 0 0 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 85
Write 83.3
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 2.5
78% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 64%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
155GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.8 0.2 0.1 0 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 71.2
Write 73.5
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 2.7
68% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 56%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 69
Write 65.7
Mixed 67.5
87% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 56%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
85GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 58 61 57 64 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 104
Write 76
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 59.5
100% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 71%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
184GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 0.2 0.1 0 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 93.7
Write 122
Mixed 113
SusWrite 2.9
111% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
193% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 74%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
461GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 58 61 59 64 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 65.8
Write 65.2
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 59.9
87% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 48%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
245GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.2 0 0.1 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
26% Poor
Read 120
Write 130
Mixed 107
SusWrite 2.9
116% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$90
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 33.9
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 32
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,015
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback