Today's hottest deals

Asus X550LN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 65% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus X550LN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550LN
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140117
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateApr 13 '20 at 21:08
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 45%
CPU Throttled 65%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 20.9
2-Core 25.1
30% 38 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 90.2
13% 97.6 Pts
64-Core 97
6% 97 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Asus(1043 131D) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4575
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
9.51% Terrible
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 10.1
11% 10.9 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 8.43
7% 8.91 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.51%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
702GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 45 39 39 67 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 92.7
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 52.6
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 5.1
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550LN Builds (Compare 291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550LN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $288WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback