Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '20 at 18:47
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 178
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 312
38% 291 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.5% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 124
Parallax 105
95% 115 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 116
Splatting 96.7
84% 104 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
87GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 242 241 242 241 248 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 598
Write 261
Mixed 336
SusWrite 242
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 50.2
168% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 228
169% 225 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 5.8 29 19 37 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 130
Write 1.2
Mixed 27
SusWrite 22.5
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 283%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 3TB
324GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.3 8.1 8.8 8.2 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.27% Terrible
Read 17
Write 4.3
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 8.3
7% 9.47 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.27%
Great: 178%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M379B5273DH0-YK0 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.5% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback