Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160404
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '20 at 07:25
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$133
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 189
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 469
52% 412 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 190
Parallax 189
126% 178 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 175
Splatting 123
114% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 251 88 95 85 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,056
Write 863
Mixed 582
SusWrite 173
148% 669 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 46.1
155% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 377
284% 378 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 118%
Great: 313%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
635GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 143 146 146 146 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 165
Write 165
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 144
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 153 156 156 157 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 163
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 155
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 109%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS/MSPRO 64GB
21GB free, PID 0181
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 19.3
Write 14.8
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 15
22% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 4
296% 4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback