Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS M730

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive0.79% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M730  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A2
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '20 at 14:09
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 147
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 256
36% 267 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 361.91
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 4.38
4% 4.22 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 0.09
2% 3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.8 5.1 5.5 6.3 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
0.79% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 6.7
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5.3
2% 6.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
0% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 0.79%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G73QH0- 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M730 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback