Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory100GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 100GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory94.2 GB free of 100 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 23 '20 at 08:21
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 222
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 405
55% 409 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID V100D-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 12C1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 426.52
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 19.3
17% 21.3 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 268GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 89 91 89 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 86%
Vmware Virtual disk 268GB
250GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 90 92 90 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 86%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
100GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 97 98 96 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 100GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback