Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 16 '20 at 12:37
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 105
52% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 318
32% 260 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 31.3
28% 29.9 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 32.6
28% 34.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 1.4 2.7 56 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.4% Below average
Read 234
Write 214
Mixed 58
SusWrite 36.6
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 22.6
82% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13.1
DQ Write 98.6
DQ Mixed 39.5
35% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
15GB free
Firmware: SD42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 77
Write 18.7
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 80.4
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 65%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$63
691GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 128 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 134
Write 134
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 128
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-074.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.1% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.6
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback