Today's hottest deals

Lenovo H220 10028

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo H220 10028  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '20 at 22:40
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 47
37% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 60.5
8-Core 56.8
8% 58.7 Pts
64-Core 50.6
3% 50.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 605
Device(1642 3A98) 1GB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HN-M320MBB 320GB
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 82 65 81 94 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 72.5
Write 82
Mixed 46
SusWrite 77.2
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
224GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 94 92 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 94.6
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 93.4
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.8 3.1 5 6 6.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 6
Mixed 3
SusWrite 4.3
8% 8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
23% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
400, 400 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H220 10028 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo H220 10028

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback