Today's hottest deals

Acer ACRPRDCT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer ACRPRDCT  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA70_HB
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '17 at 23:40
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4030U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 52.3
2-Core 94.1
50% 76 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 134
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Acer(1025 0882) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5354
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 9.69
Parallax 10.1
10% 10.8 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 8.48
7% 8.55 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 503
Write 402
Mixed 411
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 20.4
112% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 36.2
DQ Write 69.3
DQ Mixed 20.3
25% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80%
Great: 115%
WDC WD10 JPVX-22JC3T0 1TB
869GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 36.2
Mixed 36.2
47% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.18
75% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 14.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ACRPRDCT Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer ACRPRDCT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback