Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M275

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Veriton M275  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M275
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '17 at 17:01
Run Duration731 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 79.3
41% 62.1 Pts
4-Core 79.3
8-Core 79.1
11% 79.2 Pts
64-Core 78.6
5% 78.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Acer(1025 0405) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.54
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.59 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.78
0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
3GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43% Average
Read 78.1
Write 71.7
Mixed 23.8
42% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.31
86% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HDS721016CLA382 160GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPEOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 68.9
Write 64.1
Mixed 21.2
38% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.16
4K Write 0.62
4K Mixed 0.17
37% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 52%
Verbatim STORE N GO 64GB
10GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 5.61
Mixed 7.7
11% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.006
14% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 10%
WD 10EACS External 1TB
0GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 17.8
Mixed 16.9
22% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A00LF Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M275 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback