Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '20 at 17:22
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 83.3
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 169
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 248
27% 215 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8469) 3GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 53.1
Reflection 48.3
Parallax 63.2
43% 54.9 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 45.2
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,727
Write 4,928
Mixed 5,144
1,174% 5,266 MB/s
4K Read 460
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 40.1
870% 243 MB/s
DQ Read 1,009
DQ Write 545
DQ Mixed 662
523% 739 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
299GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 90 90 91 91 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 139
Write 101
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 89
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 114%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Read 19
Write 7.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 1.2
8% 8.03 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
15% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 10%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
424GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 13 14 15 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 66.2
Write 56
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 14.5
50% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 13.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback