Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181023
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '20 at 12:33
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 97
2-Core 188
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 468
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 37
33% 36.1 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 36.9
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM08L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 184 142 125 47 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 227
Write 218
Mixed 162
SusWrite 121
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 14.7
62% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 49.7
DQ Mixed 16.9
18% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 51%
Crucial MTFDDAK480TCB 480GB
36GB free
Firmware: D0MU037
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 306 305 305 298 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 314
Write 348
Mixed 220
SusWrite 303
67% 296 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 23.9
86% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 95.4
DQ Mixed 29.9
32% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFE85F-C8KM9 Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF FLFE85F-C8KM9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback