Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 30BAS04900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30BAS04900  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1037
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '20 at 10:33
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4112
CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 188
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 666
60% 508 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 202
Parallax 201
136% 190 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 182
Splatting 129
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 105 117 111 111 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 470
Write 290
Mixed 392
SusWrite 150
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 46.1
157% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 154
149% 230 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
393GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 131 132 133 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 95
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 133
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate IronWolf 12TB (2017)-$103
440GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 162 162 161 162 160 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CTD 4x16GB
4 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.3% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback