Today's hottest deals

Biostar TZ68K+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar TZ68K+  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 02:22
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 193
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 497
55% 434 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.6% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 55.5
Parallax 48.1
48% 54.3 fps
MRender 45.4
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 50.6
40% 49.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
THU 120G 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0719A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 133 78 19 89 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 390
Write 331
Mixed 17
SusWrite 83.7
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 0.6
32% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 80.6
DQ Mixed 25.1
27% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 84%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
843GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 124 120 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 57.5
Write 129
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 121
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
207% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 16JTF25664AZ-1G1F1 Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 16JTF25664AZ-1G1F1 10GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.8% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TZ68K+ Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar TZ68K+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback