Today's hottest deals

Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '20 at 14:01
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 78
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 843
78% 654 Pts
64-Core 1,117
69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 300 298 297 290 297 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 486
Write 298
Mixed 298
SusWrite 299
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 25.7
119% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 212
175% 250 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 129%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 98 97 99 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 72.7
Write 100
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 96.5
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.1
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IRX2666D464L16/16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 34.7
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 30
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 2,005 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback