Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C650D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba Satellite C650D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '17 at 12:39
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD V120
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 28.1
2-Core 26.7
31% 39.4 Pts
4-Core 24.8
8-Core 25
3% 24.9 Pts
64-Core 31.7
2% 31.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Toshiba(1179 FDE4) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.79 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.26
1% 0.81 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FG001M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 55
Write 56
Mixed 12
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.21
43% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 HMT112S6BFR6C-G7 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C650D Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C650D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback