Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Latitude E7440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Dell Latitude E7440 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '15 at 20:26
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4600U 26,548 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 92.9 2-Core 136 55% 114 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 240 31% 233 Pts	64-Core 235 15% 235 Pts
Poor: 27% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 05CB) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3574 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.59% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 4.23 Parallax 3.91 2% 3.45 fps	MRender 7.19 Gravity 1.43 Splatting 6.22 4% 4.95 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.59% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 38 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 59 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 54 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 39 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2840858371	72.3% Very good	Read 511 Write 244 Mixed 317 79% 357 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 22.2 116% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 31.8 DQ Write 80.5 DQ Mixed 81.7 55% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 118%
SK hynix SH920 mSATA 128GB 521 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 119GB free Firmware: 1010BL00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 49 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 104 (64) Unknown 100 100 176291 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 47 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 21312 (B2) Unknown 100 100 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 14 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2482 (B5) Unknown 253 253 0 (B6) Unknown 253 100 0 (B7) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 24 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BF) G-sense error rate 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 38 0 85902229542 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 2983875 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 54 (F1) Unknown 100 100 49 (F2) Unknown 100 100 34 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 482	82.7% Excellent	Read 504 Write 306 Mixed 378 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 80.3 4K Mixed 20.1 104% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 60.5 110% 218 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Latitude E7440 Builds (Compare 2,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7440

CPU
Core i7-4600UIntelBench 49%, 26,548 samples	796x
Core i5-4310UIntelBench 49%, 14,648 samples	697x
Core i5-4300UIntelBench 44%, 36,631 samples	413x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	2,000x
GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples	1x
HD Graphics FamilyIncredibleBench 3%, 12 samples	1x

SSD
PM851 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 6,648 samples	316x
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	64x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	49x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	123x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	79x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback