Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-A-13V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C50D-A-13V  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD PT10AN
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130522
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '20 at 05:14
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 31.1
2-Core 57.3
32% 48.1 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 118
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Toshiba(1179 FA33) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 2.75
2% 2.68 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.32 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 119 118 127 123 210 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.4% Average
Read 281
Write 114
Mixed 153
SusWrite 148
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 20.1
74% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 41
DQ Mixed 27.4
22% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
851GB free
Firmware: AX0A4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 119
71% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C50D-A-13V Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-A-13V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback