Today's hottest deals

HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory9.9 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '20 at 18:43
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3565
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 168
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 334
42% 319 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1700
Nvidia(10DE 049A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
843GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 125 128 136 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 141
Write 152
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 129
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.3
218% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 108%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 25 25 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 20.9
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 25.8
31% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.1% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 17.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback