Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion NY759AA-ABG 300-1060a

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion NY759AA-ABG 300-1060a  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON JESSE
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100211
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '20 at 04:02
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 400e
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 31.1
2-Core 62.6
40% 57.5 Pts
4-Core 89
8-Core 85.6
12% 87.3 Pts
64-Core 85.5
5% 85.5 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(1B0A 903A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 2.04
2% 1.95 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 203 191 191 194 193 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48% Average
Read 226
Write 205
Mixed 209
SusWrite 180
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 26.2
84% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 49.8
DQ Mixed 35
28% 37.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 48%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.4
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NY759AA-ABG 300-1060a Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion NY759AA-ABG 300-1060a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback