Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3PH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3PH  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '20 at 01:12
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 340
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 61.2
Parallax 71.4
0% 44.2 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 54.6
49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$49
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 71 83 104 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 124
Write 116
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 84.5
72% 98 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.6
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3PH Builds (Compare 401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3PH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback