Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191210
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '20 at 00:00
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 96%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$269
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 222
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 350
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.5% Good
Lighting 87.4
Reflection 79.8
Parallax 78.7
71% 82 fps
MRender 91.7
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 66.9
63% 78.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$30
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 272 262 237 207 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 1,024
Write 367
Mixed 342
SusWrite 232
108% 491 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 27.4
102% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 722
DQ Write 465
DQ Mixed 337
320% 508 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 113%
Great: 216%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: VX14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 215 215 219 219 218 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 142
Write 169
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 213
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.2% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 3,140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $479
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback