Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-C  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 18:57
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 184
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 384
48% 366 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 20
17% 19.4 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 60 51 56 64 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 83.7
Write 87.5
Mixed 43
SusWrite 56.9
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GIS GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.9% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 21.4
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback