Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4158CV2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 4158CV2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory14.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140114
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 29 '20 at 19:40
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5640
1366-pin LGA, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 132
62% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 363
41% 320 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 18.3
13% 16 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 16.7
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 234 234 235 236 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.3% Above average
Read 246
Write 232
Mixed 192
SusWrite 233
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 25.4
82% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 183
97% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 129%
VendorCo ProductCode 2GB
2GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Read 10
Write 3.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4.7
7% 5.65 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965447-001.A00LF 6x4GB
6 of 12 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback