Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory88GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 88GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF
Memory83.6 GB free of 88 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 05:13
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 167
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 579
55% 456 Pts
64-Core 1,524
94% 1,524 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 94.1
55% 76.5 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 56.8
53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC H310 499GB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 180 380 288 351 455 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 103%
Fuhler C2004 240 240GB
37GB free
Firmware: 6B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 116 103 106 98 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.2% Average
Read 252
Write 109
Mixed 169
SusWrite 105
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 19.9
86% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 90.1
DQ Mixed 27.4
48% 96.6 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 73%
Toshiba MG04ACA4 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: FJ3D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 44 45 45 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 168
Write 41.3
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 43.7
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KG07056515-95 Samsung M393B5270DH0- KG07056515-51 Micron 18JSF51272PZ- KG07056515-95 Micron 18JSF51272PZ- KG07056515-95 Samsung M393B5270DH0-C Samsung M393B5270DH0- Samsung M393B5270DH0- 88GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 4096, 16384, 4096, 16384, 4096, 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.2% Average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback